Tuti

Members
  • Content Count

    264
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Tuti last won the day on June 17

Tuti had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

136

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

397 profile views
  1. I was thinking about ways to add a "surrender system" before giving this suggestion, because I think it wouldn't be simple for Jordan to implement a intire system for that. (like, the one you vote and etc) Well I could not really found a good solution. But its possible to make something like a GvG bomb but that only affects allies? We could spawn with a tradable item. So if we want to surrender we can just give it to someone and with 6 (out of 10) he can trade to a bomb that wipe his whole team making him lose. I know its not a really good solution, but it was the less worse solution i could think of for a surrender system p_p
  2. 1/2: are ideas that there's no reason not to add (besides what Jordna said that its a lot of work). If someone doesn't like can simply don't use. 3: I think it would be nice like Awaken server where battle maps have a alternate version for runs, without any bosses. Idk how server activity will be, but having 10 spots to run can reduces the chance of someone steeling areas or of you trying to run and just being frustrated because all 5 channels are taken. 4: It would be nice even if we can't see the formula on g-healing we could compare someone who is having good heals/bad heals and see the g-healing so see how much one is lacking. (Well, besides m-rate and m-dmg of course because its pointless to have 30000 g-healing with 5% m-rate and 1.60, we know) 5: Idk if people would like to play but that's might be fixed changing time for TW. For example it starts at 3:30 pm for my girlfriend (she lives in US) and 5:30 pm for brazilians. Both are times people are still working, specially now that there's a lot people returning to work (besides the ones working at home)
  3. Oh, its okay, I don't mean it need to be release next week or anything like that. We just need to know what will be decided so we can know if we should keep weapons with low % or to just sell.
  4. I just want to say that whatever is going to be decided, it has to be ASAP. Before people starting stack lower % items to feed and then its decided that it system wont be added Or people start selling lower % cheap and then need to remake it to feed their weapons. @edit also before its to late to fix since we are on a countdown for awaken weapons
  5. Weapons awaken shouldn't be changed. The best part of having 120% weapons on cap 65 is exactly the fact we can work iwth builds other than awakens weapons. If a proc isn't that good, simply don't make the awaken version and use a 120 (?) Nom-Awaken Bow is 10 times better than pre-awaken. The reason we make the Awaken bow is exactly because of the prox. If it was bad, we would keep the - resist debuff. People say a lot of "build variety"but when there's a minimal chance that can really happen people try their best to screw it.
  6. Jordan said something about lowering weapons to 110% on cap 55 so everyone would stay at a "close stage" to begin when feed system was available. So I think making it for 65 weapons and letting 110%+ drops would be the best choice for this cap.
  7. Just mentioned it because part of the old discussion was people complaining about gearing classes with $ was to expensive. I'm not complaining about the solution you guys are bringing, in fact, I think that's sad that took just a few minutes for someone come to complain but no one said anything abou class tokens dropping on 0/2. Like you said, that they want just to complain. I'm a bit afraid that this solution will lead to people complaining about how expensive is +8/+10 when everyone have +6 and demand for +8/+10 stones increase, but i'm leaving that to future, if it happens.
  8. We need to remember that the chance to a successful fortification for lower levels are higher, that's why they are using normal stones. +5 to +6 chance is way highter than to +8/9/10. The real problem of the solution is that doesn't fix anything about how costly it is to +10 gears on the server. But for +6, lets see how much viridians will cost before starting to complain and asking they to change it already.
  9. Tuti

    10vs10

    No please. I've saw people saying "I rather wait 10 min than go into x match" and quit. Shorting it would just make more people start doing it. I play 10x10 daily (couldn't play last few days because of my connection, sadly) and I know how painful is to alpaca and get the deflector. But its way last painful than keep having people ragequiting on a arena that is already making a lot of people alpaca.
  10. Tuti

    10vs10

    That would be great due to the amount of alpaca/random dc we have in 10x10. But we got to remember that 10x10 is here to protect us from people quitting just because they got a bad team or anyshit like that, so its not really a good idea to remove it.
  11. That's good. I hope if we need to reach step 2, only viridians are affected by the wipe since its the stone that is having his position changed. But in general its good, makes it easier to people have a +6 base to be able to continue farming for they +10.
  12. The possibility to add another step to this besides the racial (Farming an item you need to fuse on arcane box before using the enchanted stone) is there to make sure you can balance it well. You can have it as a low percentage drop from bosses, or as daily quest that gives you a limited ammount of the supposed item. TBH I just didn't wanted to add this direct to the suggesion but instead adding just as a possibility of doing it, because I was afraid people was going to complain about having to farm the stone and then farming to be able to use after enchanted. But the idea is to add value to the stone by grinding a bit more so you need to grind less gold (As you would be using less stones) but still needs to grind the item so you could use the stone. Making it less frustrating than 10% stones because would fail less, but not making +10 easily like in Awkaen or anything like that.
  13. I will just say what I did in other post again. Racials shouldnt be removed from PVP/game. Some like Cleric - malice human racial could be changed, yes. Not necessary but could be changed. But "broken" racials shouldn't be changed because of people picking a race to play it. Everyone knew the racials before creating their characters and they could pick it too, if they think its broken. I agree of removing it from 1v1, because there are racials with no counter-play. But on 3x3, 10x10, TW and GvG they all should stay how they are rn or only buff useless racials without nerfing any.
  14. I lost 1v1 to a friend playing alt with a lv50+2 cestus, no accessories, trash trophies and a shield. He just used frog racial and then I was dead.
  15. Other pets were like this too, I think Jordan forgot to change Ranger pet before releasing.